On Nov 29, 2007 12:18 AM, Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>
> > On Nov 29, 2007 12:05 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> > <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> > >
> > > > @@ -246,8 +246,13 @@ const char *setup_git_directory_gently(int *nongit_ok)
> > > > static char buffer[1024 + 1];
> > > > const char *retval;
> > > >
> > > > - if (!work_tree_env)
> > > > - return set_work_tree(gitdirenv);
> > > > + if (!work_tree_env) {
> > > > + retval = set_work_tree(gitdirenv);
> > > > + /* config may override worktree */
> > > > + check_repository_format();
> > > > + return retval;
> > > > + }
> > > > + check_repository_format();
> > >
> > > Why not move this check before the if? Other than that, ACK.
> >
> > If so it would be called twice if work_tree_env is not set.
>
> Well, I would have left the original
>
> if (!work_tree_env)
> return set_work_tree(gitdirenv);
>
> alone...
>
> If that is not possible, it might be good to add a comment as to why.
I did, and the tests failed. I also added a comment "config may
override worktree". set_work_tree() will reset git_work_tree_cfg but
the correct behaviour is config takes precedence (from comment of
set_work_tree). The comment is clearly not clear enough. Maybe this?
+ if (!work_tree_env) {
+ retval = set_work_tree(gitdirenv);
+ /* config may override worktree (see
set_work_tree comment) */
+ check_repository_format();
+ return retval;
+ }
> Ciao,
> Dscho
>
>
--
Duy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
