Re: [GSoC PATCH] t9400: prefer test_path_* helper functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Aryan Pathania <aryan.pathania2003@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Junio, thanks a lot for taking time to review my patch.
>
>>That is exactly Patrick suggested (go back and read it).  I agree
>>with him that the updated stronger check is an improvement and it
>>deserves to be explained in the commit message.
> I apologize for miscomunication. I was agreeing with the suggestion.

Sorry for misreading what you wrote.  Mistakes happen, so please
don't over-apologize around here ;-)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux