Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I remember not quite being happy with the double-negation myself. I >> don't mind renaming the prerequisite we have in our test suite for >> consistency, as well, if you want to do that. > > Yes, I can do that when I re-roll the patches at > https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1863.git.1740149837.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/ > to use WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES Thanks, both.
