Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Christian, Karthik, Patrick, Jialuo and all, > > On 05/02/25 18:50, Christian Couder wrote: >> Hi Kaartic and all, >> >> On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 7:33 PM Kaartic Sivaraam >> <kaartic.sivaraam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I have just added myself as a possible mentor. If possible I'd like to >> just co-mentor this project and someone else to be the main mentor for >> this project. >> > > ... >> >> I have just added myself as a possible mentor. If possible I'd like to >> be the main mentor for this project. >> > > Thank you for adding yourself as a potential mentor! > > With this, it seems to me like we could at the max. accept 3 students > >>> Note that I haven't assigned any mentors / co-mentors for each project. >>> I suppose we could assign that based on the applications we receive and >>> the ideas that we end up selecting. >>> >>> Based on Christian's inputs, we should be able to distribute >>> projects among mentors well. >> >> Yeah, I hope it will be possible to distribute projects among mentors well. >> > > Indeed. From all of your inputs I was able to come to the following > allocation of mentor / co-mentor. > > -- 8< -- > > Consolidate ref-related functionality into git-refs > > - Mentor: Patrick > - Co-mentor: Jialuo / Christian > > Refactoring in order to reduce Git’s global state > > - Mentor: Christian > - Co-mentor: Karthik / Jialuo > > Machine-Readable Repository Information Query Tool > > - Mentor: Karthik > - Co-mentor: Patrick > > Implement support for reftables in “dumb” HTTP transport > > - Mentor: Patrick > - Co-mentor: Karthik > > -- >8 -- > > Let me know if this sounds fine to all of you. So, I suppose we could > pick a maximum of 3 projects but we cannot pick both "Consolidate > ref-related functionality into git-refs" and "Implement support > for reftables in “dumb” HTTP transport" at the same time as Patrick > only prefers to be mentor in one project. > This looks great to me, thanks for putting it together. Once the applications start coming in, we can finalize on which combination works out for us. > > Based on this, I'll tweak the ideas page to mention that we could > pick a max of 3 candidates. > > > BTW, I've just submitted Git's application for GSoC. We should know > by February 26 about the selection result. > Again, thanks for all the work here! > -- > Sivaraam
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
