On 03/02/25 18:51, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:
I was wondering whether it might make sense to also move the list of
microprojects into the Git project itself, e.g. as something like
"Documentation/Projects.txt". This would make it easier for us to update
the list of long-running projects whenever a new project is added and
makes it easier for people to discover it.
I wonder if this is better managed as either a separate tree (like
the 'todo' branch that houses "What's cooking" reports among other
things) with history disjoint from the main project, or even a
separate Wiki?
Just to cross-check this, isn't the current home for this file,
http://git.github.io, already a separate wiki of sorts? The site's
description literally says something along the same lines:
> These pages are intended to be edited collaboratively (i.e., it is an
> alternative to us having a wiki, but one that is edited entirely via
> Git pushes. The repository could be found on GitHub.
So, do you think if it would be fine to leave it where it currently is?
[[ References ]]
[1]: https://git.github.io/
--
Sivaraam
