Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> But I have a feeling it is just putting the same on >> both of us as we see the same CI failures and poke at them >> independently. > > Certainly true. > >> I dunno. I'll try it for a while and see how it goes. After seeing a few of your messages that begin with "Coverity complains ...", I appreciate them a lot. Earlier I was naively hoping that triage-and-hand-off-to-original-author would be much less work but no, we very much need to somehow find a way to push the triaging part to individual topic authors or this thing will not scale. Perhaps I can control the rate of topics that trickle into 'jch' from 'seen' to keep them a bit more manageable somehow? If an iffy topic that begins its life in 'seen' gets rerolled number of times while there, but after the final reroll before getting merged to 'jch' (because it was marked as "Will merge to 'next'?" or better in the What's cooking draft), it never gets rerolled until it hits 'next', then your workload would not change compared to the days back when you built yours on 'next'. Of course, the question then becomes "who will vet these topics so that they do not need a big reroll before it hits 'jch'?", and we are back to square one? So, I dunno. Thanks.
