Re: [PATCH] fetch set_head: fix non-mirror remotes in bare repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu Jan 23, 2025 at 22:00, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Bence Ferdinandy <bence@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> In b1b713f722 (fetch set_head: handle mirrored bare repositories,
>> 2024-11-22) it was implicitly assumed that all remotes will be mirrors
>> in a bare repository, thus fetching a non-mirrored remote could lead to
>> HEAD pointing to a non-existent reference. Make sure we only overwrite
>> HEAD if we are in a bare repository and fetching from a mirror.
>> Otherwise, proceed as normally, and create
>> refs/remotes/<nonmirrorremote>/HEAD instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bence Ferdinandy <bence@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reported-by: Christian Hesse <list@xxxxxxxx>
>
> These should be chronological; somebody reports an issue, the patch
> gets written, and finally it is sent out with a Sign-off to certify
> that the patch is not a stolen property.

Makes sense, I'll send a v2 in that case.

>
>> ---
>>  builtin/fetch.c   | 15 ++++++++-------
>>  t/t5505-remote.sh | 10 ++++++++++
>>  t/t5510-fetch.sh  | 13 +++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> We haven't heard from Chritian; has this been tested OK?

To the extent of the tests I've added, but I'm not aware of anybody else,
especially Christian trying it out.

>
> What the patch does does look sensible.  Thanks.

Thanks,
Bence





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux