Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > Karthik has meanwhile sent a v2 [1] of the broken patch in (1) that > fixes the issue discovered in (2). Given that (1) has already been in > next, (2) probably needs to be rerolled to be a patch on top of what we > already have in next. > > Other than that yes, I think (4) and (5) can be merged independently of > (1) to (3). Thanks for sanity checking me.
