Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] object-name: fix a pair of object name resolution issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 10:15 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Changes since v2:
> >
> >  * Readability improvement to the first patch, which fixes object name
> >    resolution with refs containing a curly brace
> >  * Fixed the second patch for cases like OBJ-COUNT-gHASH~13 and added a
> >    couple test cases for that. Also, extended the commit message a bit to
> >    discuss the cases brought up on the list.
> >
> > For the second patch, if folks want some open source examples where it could
> > be triggered, I found two examples:
> >
> >  * lore.git: git cat-file -t master:random/path/major-gaffed
> >  * git.git: git cat-file -t super-invalid~///\\.....@.lock-gfd0bba94e
> >
> > Elijah Newren (2):
> >   object-name: fix resolution of object names containing curly braces
> >   object-name: be more strict in parsing describe-like output
> >
> >  object-name.c       | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  t/t1006-cat-file.sh | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  t/t6120-describe.sh | 24 +++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Although ...
>
> >      +    Note that we'd prefer duplicating the special logic for "@^" characters
> >      +    here, because if get_oid_basic() or interpret_nth_prior_checkout() or
>
> ... I suspect that you meant "we'd prefer not duplicating" here,
> both patches look very good to me.

Oops, indeed.

> Thanks, will replace.

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux