On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 02:00:35PM +0100, Matteo Bagnolini wrote: > From: matteobagnolini <matteobagnolini2003@xxxxxxxxx> > > `test -f` and `! test -f` do not provide clear error messages when they fail. > To enhance debuggability, use `test_path_is_file` and `test_path_is_missing`, > which instead provide more informative error messages. > > Note that `! test -f` checks if a path is not a file, while > `test_path_is_missing` verifies that a path does not exist. In this specific > case the tests are meant to check the absence of the path, making > `test_path_is_missing` a valid replacement. Thanks, this version looks good to me. Patrick
