Re: [PATCH 2/4] reftable/merged: fix zero-sized allocation when there are no readers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi
>
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2024, at 12:50, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
>> It was reported [1c
>
> A Neo user, I see.
>
> s/c/]/
>
>> [snip]
>> the result. Now that we do we notice and thus return an out-of-memory
>> error to the caller.
>
> s/Now that we do we/Now we do notice/
>
> Repeat of “we”.  And “that” can’t be be used since it has nothing to
> connect to.

I read "Now that we do, we notice and ..." a perfectly sensible
construct, though.

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux