Re: [PATCH 2/4] reftable/merged: fix zero-sized allocation when there are no readers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

On Sat, Dec 21, 2024, at 12:50, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> It was reported [1c

A Neo user, I see.

s/c/]/

> [snip]
> the result. Now that we do we notice and thus return an out-of-memory
> error to the caller.

s/Now that we do we/Now we do notice/

Repeat of “we”.  And “that” can’t be be used since it has nothing to
connect to.

-- 
Kristoffer Haugsbakk






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux