Re: [PATCH] t1400: fix --no-create-reflog test and description

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I didn’t get the impression that this is expecting a reroll.  But I
> haven’t seen it mentioned or applied to `seen`/`next`?

If the interim maintainer did not think it is ready to be queued to
'seen', I won't go back to the list archive to pick it up (after
all, that is part of trusting interim maintainer is about---otherwise
I have to go back and consume all the list backlog, which does not
make sense).

If a topic is worth resurrecting, do resend it for discussion.
Looking at the archived discussion (for this topic I am making an
exception), I did not get an impression that this got a "yeah this
is a good thing to do" support, only a lukewarm "it may be a
starting point in a good direction".

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux