Re: [PATCH] t1400: fix --no-create-reflog test and description

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] t1400: fix --no-create-reflog test and description
From: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 13:11:15 +0100
Cc: "Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@xxxxxx>, "Taylor Blau" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Feedback-id: i2671468f:Fastmail
In-reply-to: <ab7d4c8d89c075de05bf04f1f9dc195145455964.1729439476.git.code@khaugsbakk.name>
References: <ab7d4c8d89c075de05bf04f1f9dc195145455964.1729439476.git.code@khaugsbakk.name>

I didn’t get the impression that this is expecting a reroll.  But I
haven’t seen it mentioned or applied to `seen`/`next`?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] t1400: fix --no-create-reflog test and description
  - From: Junio C Hamano

References:
- [PATCH] t1400: fix --no-create-reflog test and description
  - From: kristofferhaugsbakk

Prev by Date: Re: Question about merge & cherry pick
Next by Date: [PATCH v6 0/9] packfile: avoid using the 'the_repository' global variable
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] t1400: fix --no-create-reflog test and description
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] t1400: fix --no-create-reflog test and description
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux