On Nov 8, 2007 3:42 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On 11/7/07, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 11/7/07, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > [2/5] Gaah, AIX sed X-<. I am not opposed to this patch but > >> > would want to get Yays from people with non GNU sed. Is > >> > busybox sed good enough to grok our scripts these days? > >> > Please ask help and collect Acks at least from folks on > >> > Solaris, MacOS, FBSD, and OBSD. > >> > >> I haven't extensively used all the scripts. There seems to be no > >> sed-related failure from git testsuite results in my git-box branch. > >> So I would say for now it's good enough. > > > > Argh, should have made it clear, busybox sed is good enough. > > Thanks. And you can also happy grok Ralf's rewritten construct, > right? > > That is, existing > > $ sed -e 's/foo/\n/' file > > will be rewritten by the patch [2/5] to > > $ sed -e 's/foo/\ > /' file > > Yes it worked well -- Duy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
