"Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 11/7/07, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 11/7/07, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > [2/5] Gaah, AIX sed X-<. I am not opposed to this patch but
>> > would want to get Yays from people with non GNU sed. Is
>> > busybox sed good enough to grok our scripts these days?
>> > Please ask help and collect Acks at least from folks on
>> > Solaris, MacOS, FBSD, and OBSD.
>>
>> I haven't extensively used all the scripts. There seems to be no
>> sed-related failure from git testsuite results in my git-box branch.
>> So I would say for now it's good enough.
>
> Argh, should have made it clear, busybox sed is good enough.
Thanks. And you can also happy grok Ralf's rewritten construct,
right?
That is, existing
$ sed -e 's/foo/\n/' file
will be rewritten by the patch [2/5] to
$ sed -e 's/foo/\
/' file
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
