"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > All of these look correct. > > Maybe all of the commits could be combined into one commit with the > message “treewide: fix typos”. But that wasn’t asked for last time.[1] > So I dunno. It depends. When done carefully to make sure that nothing textually conflicts with any topics in flight, a single "treewide" patch is slightly nicer. If nothing conflicts with nothing else, either format is fine. If something have nasty conflicts (e.g., a refactor moved the comment with typos far from the original location or even to a different file), individual patch form is easier to discard the ones that need to wait. I do not know which case this 20-patch collection falls into. Thanks.
