Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > I also have to agree that "push.pushOption" would be way more sensible > if it was configured per remote. I think it would be sensible to also > introduce "remote.*.pushOption" in the same way and have it override the > default value of "push.pushOption" if present. So the precedence order > would become (from high to low): > > - remote.someRemote.pushOption > - remote."*".pushOption > - push.PushOption > > This should be backwards compatible, too. ;-) Sounds sensible.
