Jon Smirl wrote:
> On 11/10/07, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Saturday, 10 November 2007, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>> On 11/10/07, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> [daedalus]$ git for-each-ref --format="%(refname):%09%(committer)" \
>>>> --sort=-committerdate refs/heads
>>>> refs/heads/m24: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> 1191362799 -0400
>>>> refs/heads/m25: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> 1191472422 -0400
>>>> refs/heads/m26: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> 1194382038 -0500
>>>> refs/heads/m28: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> 1194385071 -0500
>>>> refs/heads/m29: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> 1194585780 -0500
>>>
>>> It appears to be using the first head instead of the most recent date.
>>
>> It appears to not _sort_ the output by committerdate, as it should with
>> '--sort=-committerdate'.
>
> It is sorted by committerdate, the sort is ascending. Did you expect
> it to be descending, pick off the last entry instead of the first?
Excerpts from git-for-each-ref(1):
git-for-each-ref [--count=<count>]* (...) [--sort=<key>]* (...)
<count>
By default the command shows all refs that match <pattern>. This
option makes it stop after showing that many refs.
<key> A field name to sort on. Prefix - to sort in descending order of the
value. When unspecified, refname is used. More than one sort keys
can be given.
So I expect --sort=-committerdate to sort by date of committing,
descending, and --count=1 pick first one, which means most recent.
It looks like "your" gitweb sorts ascending instead... strange...
How does git_get_last_activity subroutine in your gitweb.cgi looks like?
Does it have '--sort=-commiterdate'? If it has, then I think it is some
strange bug in git, if it doesn't it is strange modification of gitweb.
HTH
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
