Re: SIGSEGV Error Occurs When Attempting to Unbundle Without Initializing Git Repository.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-08-12 at 11:47:33, Jeff King wrote:
> So one option is to just do that check earlier. But that leaves other
> sub-commands of "git bundle":
> 
>   - "create" likewise requires a repo, and seems OK. That makes sense
>     since we're not reading anything.
> 
>   - "verify" requires a repo, which I wouldn't have expected, but I
>     guess it's because we probably unbundle under the hood to walk.
>     Anyway, it gets the ordering right here and checks the repo before
>     opening the bundle.
> 
>   - list-heads doesn't require a repo, and segfaults. So it really does
>     need some kind of detection or default to know which hash to use.

If the bundle is v2, it's SHA-1.  If the bundle is v3, then it should
have a an @object-format= header, which is sufficient to set the hash
algorithm.  The default for v3 is still SHA-1, but we have never emitted
a v3 bundle without an object-format header (except for maybe a commit
or two somewhere in the history).
-- 
brian m. carlson (they/them or he/him)
Toronto, Ontario, CA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux