Rubén Justo <rjusto@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I thought it wasn't necessary to modify the first two, which remain > correct, and I didn't want to bring them up again. Additionally, > keeping the dates of the first two different from the two modified here > could be interesting. Then at least you should have said so. From the receiving end, that and retracting the first two would look the same, so there needs to be some clue to let the receiver tell which one is the case. Thanks.
