Re: [PATCH 3/4] check-non-portable-shell: improve `VAR=val shell-func` detection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kyle Lippincott <spectral@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Is there an example of a shell on Linux that has this behavior that I
> can observe, and/or reproduction steps?

Every once in a while this comes up and we fix, e.g.

https://lore.kernel.org/git/528CE716.8060307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
https://lore.kernel.org/git/c6efda03848abc00cf8bf8d84fc34ef0d652b64c.1264151435.git.mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
https://lore.kernel.org/git/Koa4iojOlOQ_YENPwWXKt7G8Aa1x6UaBnFFtliKdZmpcrrqOBhY7NQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180713055205.32351-2-sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
https://lore.kernel.org/git/574E27A4.6040804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

which is from a query

    https://lore.kernel.org/git/?q=one-shot+export+shell+function

but unfortunately we do not document which exact shell the observed
breakage happened with.

The closest article I found that is suitable as a discussion
reignitor talks about what POSIX requires, which may be more
relevant:

  https://lore.kernel.org/git/4B5027B8.2090507@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux