On Monday, July 15, 2024 2:34 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: ><rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>>As I speculated earlier in an earlier message, the breakage you >>>reported >> may have to >>>do with interaction between "local" and use of a subshell, and perhaps >>>we >> can also >>>check that pattern in the test. >> >> That is that I am also suggesting but did not say it as precisely. Thanks. > >Oh, I see. Are you volunteering to come up with a minimum addition to t0000.1 >then? I'll have to give this some thought on the best way to verify local that does not break the various other shells. I only have a limited set (ksh, bash). Maybe someone with a linux system might be in a better position.
