<rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>As I speculated earlier in an earlier message, the breakage you reported > may have to >>do with interaction between "local" and use of a subshell, and perhaps we > can also >>check that pattern in the test. > > That is that I am also suggesting but did not say it as precisely. Thanks. Oh, I see. Are you volunteering to come up with a minimum addition to t0000.1 then? Thanks.
