Rubén Justo <rjusto@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:04:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > + die("unable to start the pager: '%s'", pager);
>>
>> If this error string is not used elsewhere, it probably is a good
>> idea to "revert" to the original error message lost by ea27a18c,
>> which was:
>>
>> die("unable to execute pager '%s'", pager);
>
> Makes sense. Let me know if you need me to reroll.
>
>> Just in case there is a reason why we should instead silently return
>> on MinGW, I'll Cc the author of bfdd9ffd, though.
>
> Yup. I did notice the MINGW conditions in t7006 but, to be honest, I
> hadn't thought about this. Thank you for considering it and seeking
> confirmation.
After these questions are answered satisfactory, can you send an
updated version to conclude the topic?
Thanks.
