Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > But what you are really asking is how close this is to the optimal. > I didn't include that in Patch 5 details, but I was able to look at > my notes and see that the sparse_path_count data point was 1,962, > meaning there are that many sparse trees in the sparse index before > expanding. Thus, the 6,521 lstat() calls are 3.3x more than the > absolute minimum required. Nice, and still impressive. Thanks.
