Re: [PATCH 0/4] varargs functions with __attributes__(())

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 08, 2024 at 11:37:43AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> There are several varargs functions that take either NULL-terminated
> list of parameters, or printf-like format followed by list of
> parameters, that are not declared as such with __attributes__(()).
> 
> Adding such a missing attribute to trace2_region_enter_printf()
> revealed that an existing call to it was trying to format a value of
> type size_t using "%d", which is not such an excellent idea.  Other
> functions that were lacking attributes fortunately did not have any
> broken existing callers.

Great, I am happy to see these. I assume you found them all by grepping?

I wonder if there is a way to convince the compiler (or coccinelle) to
complain about any varargs function that does not have one of our
usual annotations. It's possible to have other conventions (e.g., an
"int" up front specifying the number of entries) but in practice I doubt
we would ever use one.

Still, I suspect the answer is probably "no", there is not an easy way
to do it.

-Peff




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux