On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 09:32:09AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > So for the pedantic warnings, we're left with a guess as to whether -Og > > or -O2 will yield more results. And in my experience it is probably -O2. > > > > If we want to get coverage of -Og, I'd suggest doing it in a job that is > > otherwise overlapping with another (maybe linux-TEST-vars, which I think > > is otherwise a duplicate build?). > > The same knee-jerk reaction came to me. > > Speaking of variants, is there any interest in migrating one or some > of the existing x86-64 CI jobs to arm64 CI jobs GitHub introduced > recently? I suspect that we won't find any endianness bugs (I > expect they are configured to do little endian just like everybody > else) and there may no longer be lurking unaligned read bugs (but > "git log --grep=unaligned" finds surprising number of them we have > seen and fixed), so the returns may be very small. Note that we already run arm64 via GitLab's macOS runners. That's not Linux of course, but I guess that any architectural issues should still be caught by that. Not to say that we shouldn't adapt GitHub. Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
