On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 09:25:20AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Indeed, that seems to be the case. With the attached at the tip of > > the branch and rebuilding 'seen' seems to pass these 6130, 7010, 8002 > > tests with SANTIZE=leak. > > > > From f307bbf7bd317d90db29bd1589b49e84b9e37e88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:03:34 -0700 > > Subject: [PATCH] fixup! object-file: mark cached object buffers as const > > > > --- > > object-file.c | 4 +++- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/object-file.c b/object-file.c > > index b5b5a59dc6..2d5bd3a211 100644 > > --- a/object-file.c > > +++ b/object-file.c > > @@ -1785,8 +1785,10 @@ int pretend_object_file(void *buf, unsigned long len, enum object_type type, > > > > hash_object_file(the_hash_algo, buf, len, type, oid); > > if (repo_has_object_file_with_flags(the_repository, oid, OBJECT_INFO_QUICK | OBJECT_INFO_SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT) || > > - find_cached_object(oid)) > > + find_cached_object(oid)) { > > + free(co_buf); > > return 0; > > + } > > ALLOC_GROW(cached_objects, cached_object_nr + 1, cached_object_alloc); > > co = &cached_objects[cached_object_nr++]; > > co->size = len; > > Wait. Why do we need to allocate co_buf that early in the first > place? IOW, shouldn't the fixup be more like this? That is of course the much more elegant solution here. Will adapt. Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature