On 6/6/24 03:27, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Thanks for taking a closer look, I wasn't aware of that. Reading
Peff's reply it seems like timestamp is actually unsigned and as we
limit the maximum year to 2099 it seems unlikely we'll overflow from
too larger date after all.
Thanks all.
I haven't seen one question I posed answered, though. Has
https://git.github.io/htmldocs/SubmittingPatches.html#real-name
been followed in this patch when signing off the patch?
I have changed the line in the commit to properly follow that rule.
