Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Thanks for taking a closer look, I wasn't aware of that. Reading > Peff's reply it seems like timestamp is actually unsigned and as we > limit the maximum year to 2099 it seems unlikely we'll overflow from > too larger date after all. Thanks all. I haven't seen one question I posed answered, though. Has https://git.github.io/htmldocs/SubmittingPatches.html#real-name been followed in this patch when signing off the patch?
