Re: git pull opinion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Johannes Schindelin wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 12:59:07PM CET:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > Since I simply don't have the time resources to just implement that, 
> > I'll thank you for your attention and go back to lurking mode now.
> 
> You might as well be honest, and say that they are not time constraints, 
> but lack of motivation.

No.  I will not do it, because the marginal cost of getting to
know not only git but also its source is too high for my precious
time ATM.  Maybe next year.

Will you do it for me if I buy you some beer?  If I promise to
(continue to) proofread git documentation for a couple of months?
If I do more audit of git's shell code, searching for nonportable
constructs?  Or if I promise to try to help you with any autotools
issue you might have?  Or would money be needed?  This:

> Implementing that feature would be a piece of cake [...]

doesn't sound like it, but I would understand very well if it
needed that.

Please consider that division of work really can be advantageous
and that not all git users want to be or can be developers at all
times.

Cheers,
Ralf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux