Hello,
> As far as I remember, a patch was proposed to change this mis-
> behavior of "git stash" (one could argue that it's a PEBCAK issue,
> but I really think this command is *way* too dangerous) but I don't
> think it's been accepted at this time.
I think that people will use this a lot with the pull command and some
accidents will happen. I am of the opinion that the semantics of this
command must be changed.
Additionally, having "git stash [command]" and "git stash [argument]"
mixed together seems strange. One suggestion would be:
git stash store/add/create [stash-name]
git stash apply [stash-name]
git stash clear <stash-name> (accepts wildcards but no empty args)
...
- Aghiles.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
