On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 03:45:05PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * ps/undecided-is-not-necessarily-sha1 (2024-05-06) 15 commits > (merged to 'next' on 2024-05-08 at 9f8e894685) > + repository: stop setting SHA1 as the default object hash > + oss-fuzz/commit-graph: set up hash algorithm > + builtin/shortlog: don't set up revisions without repo > + builtin/diff: explicitly set hash algo when there is no repo > + builtin/bundle: abort "verify" early when there is no repository > + builtin/blame: don't access potentially unitialized `the_hash_algo` > + builtin/rev-parse: allow shortening to more than 40 hex characters > + remote-curl: fix parsing of detached SHA256 heads > + attr: fix BUG() when parsing attrs outside of repo > + attr: don't recompute default attribute source > + parse-options-cb: only abbreviate hashes when hash algo is known > + path: move `validate_headref()` to its only user > + path: harden validation of HEAD with non-standard hashes > + Merge branch 'ps/the-index-is-no-more' into ps/undecided-is-not-necessarily-sha1 > + Merge branch 'jc/no-default-attr-tree-in-bare' into ps/undecided-is-not-necessarily-sha1 > (this branch is used by jc/undecided-is-not-necessarily-sha1-fix.) > > Before discovering the repository details, We used to assume SHA-1 > as the "default" hash function, which has been corrected. Hopefully > this will smoke out codepaths that rely on such an unwarranted > assumptions. > > Will cook in 'next', as it has known breakage. > source: <cover.1715057362.git.ps@xxxxxx> The follow-up patches in jc/undecided-is-not-necessarily-sha1-fix have landed by now, so there are no more known breakages at the current point, right? Do we want to merge this down now, or is there something you'd like me to do in this context? Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
