Re: [PATCH 0/2] give range-diff at the end of single patch output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> To me, a range diff is like an additional description of the
> actual patch, or like a really long footnote, so to me it makes
> more sense to put it at the end of the "document".  Sometimes I
> don't even want or need to look at that footnote, so not needing
> to scroll down is another plus.

That apparently makes the three of us, counting Patrick [*].

Personally, for a single-patch "series", I find that interdiff is
often easier to see than the range diff, but that is a separate
story.

[Reference]
 * https://lore.kernel.org/git/Zk7UsJjhY_FV2z8C@tanuki/




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux