Re: [PATCH 0/2] give range-diff at the end of single patch output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-05-24 01:25, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Hmm...  I think this should be made configurable, with the current
behavior being the default.  Without that, we could easily disrupt
many people's workflows, because the power of "muscle memory" is
often really strong.

I would view this more like "Porcelain layers reserve the right to
change the behaviour to suit human-end-user needs, without having to
complicate the system with extra configuration knobs."

But if other people want to do a follow-up patch to cleanly add such
a configuration, I would not object to it.  The main desire of this
patch is *not* to make the option to have range-diff at the end of a
single patch "series" available, but to make that the default.

I see.  Personally, I find the range diffs placed _after_ the actual
patches more pleasant, but I'm just concerned about other people that
might not like such an arrangement that much.

To me, a range diff is like an additional description of the actual patch,
or like a really long footnote, so to me it makes more sense to put it
at the end of the "document". Sometimes I don't even want or need to look
at that footnote, so not needing to scroll down is another plus.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux