On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:09:25AM +0200, Dragan Simic wrote:
> > @@ -1387,7 +1388,7 @@ N_("j - leave this hunk undecided, see next
> > undecided hunk\n"
> > "/ - search for a hunk matching the given regex\n"
> > "s - split the current hunk into smaller hunks\n"
> > "e - manually edit the current hunk\n"
> > - "p - print the current hunk\n"
> > + "p - print the current hunk, 'P' to use the pager\n"
>
> I think it would be better to move the description of "P" into
> a separate line after the "p" line, perhaps like this:
>
> "P - use the pager to print the current hunk\n"
>
> I know, we'd sacrifice one line of the valuable vertical space
> this way, but I find it more consistent and much harder to miss
> the new "P" option.
Making 'P' a /version/ of 'p' allows us to skip adding 'P' to the list
of available options:
(1/1) Stage this hunk [y,n,q,a,d,j,J,k,K,g,/,s,e,p,P,?]
This is what I though and this long list is what worries me.
But I see your point. I am not opposed to adding a new line.
