Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > > "CPUnn:" in /proc/cpuinfo instead of the usual "processor NN:". >> > >> > not sure if worth a reroll, but the "usual" syntax is "processor : NN" > ... > Inclusion of the word "usual" is such a minor flaw in the commit > message that I doubt it warrants a reroll and the associated cost on > reviewers and on the maintainer (Junio), especially since it does not > negatively impact the intent conveyed by the commit messages nor the > correctness of the actual patch. > > As such, I'm not worried about it. Whether Junio reads this and wants > to correct it in his tree is up to him, of course. I think "usual" is not what was pointed out. The order between the colon and NN is.
