Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 04:55:26PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * ps/refs-without-the-repository-updates (2024-05-17) 17 commits >> ... >> Further clean-up the refs subsystem to stop relying on >> the_repository, and instead use the repository associated to the >> ref_store object. >> >> Will merge to 'next'? >> source: <cover.1715929858.git.ps@xxxxxx> > > We've waited a couple more days now, and there was no additional > feedback so far. I'm happy for this to be merged down. > >> * ps/reftable-reusable-iterator (2024-05-13) 13 commits >> ... >> >> Code clean-up to make the reftable iterator closer to be reusable. >> >> Comments? >> source: <cover.1715589670.git.ps@xxxxxx> > > There was a round of reviews by Justin on this one, which I've addressed > in v2 and which was acked by him. I'll try to rope in more reviewers > internally to get this over the finish line, but I'd also highly > appreciate any GitLab-external reviews here. Yeah, it was just me who didn't go back to the thread and update the topic state. I think this one is in good enough shape to be merged down. >> * ps/reftable-write-options (2024-05-13) 11 commits >> ... >> >> The knobs to tweak how reftable files are written have been made >> available as configuration variables. >> >> Comments? >> source: <cover.1715587849.git.ps@xxxxxx> > > Same here, I'll try to rope in additional reviewers. Ditto. FYI, the ones labeled as "Will merge to 'next'?" and "Comments?" were often already read by me and I found nothing that needs further comments by myself. The latter tends to be topics I am less sure about (not about implementation, but assumptions and use cases the topic is based on) than the former.
