Re: [PATCH 0/6] pack-bitmap: various pack-bitmap-write cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 11:05:25AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 03:56:46PM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote:
> > This topic was born out of tb/pseudo-merge-bitmaps, which has a few
> > quality-of-life improvements in the pack-bitmap machinery.
> >
> > The main changes are to remove the static 'struct bitmap_writer', drop
> > one unused fields, and start using another unused one (see "move
> > commit_positions into commit_pos fields").
> >
> > There are other smaller changes, too, like cleaning up the flag
> > allocation table in object.h, as well as introducing a new
> > bitmap_writer_free() function.
> >
> > The next round of tb/pseudo-merge-bitmaps will be based on this branch.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your review!
> I've got some tiny nits, but overall this series looks good to me
> already. I don't mind if it's merged in the current state if you don't
> think any of the nits are worthy to be addressed.

Thanks, both, for your review!


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux