Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] reftable/writer: improve error when passed an invalid block size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

> The reftable format only supports block sizes up to 16MB. When the
> writer is being passed a value bigger than that it simply calls
> abort(3P), which isn't all that helpful due to the lack of a proper
> error message.
>
> Improve this by calling `BUG()` instead.

As a "git" person, I do not mind this at all.

But doesn't the reftable/ library codebase want to avoid things like
BUG() that are very much tied to our codebase, for the same reason
as it avoids things like xmalloc(), xcalloc(), and ALLOC_GROW()?

We may have crossed the bridge long time ago, though.  We see a
handful calls to BUG() already inside reftable/ directory.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux