Alejandro Martinez Ruiz <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon 05 Nov 2007, 11:28, Steven Grimm wrote: >> >> But that suggested command is not going to convince anyone they were wrong >> about git being hard to learn. I wonder if instead of saying, "I know what >> you meant, but I'm going to make you type a different command," we should >> make git revert just do what the user meant. > > I think that would just add to confusion. "revert" applies to full > changesets, not single files, plus it creates a new commit, which is > probably not what the user wants. Most of them just want to revert some > local changes to some random files, so teach them what they need, if > anything. > >> There is already precedent for that kind of mixed-mode UI: >> >> git checkout my-branch >> vs. >> git checkout my/source/file.c > > This is a different case: you're basically performing the same > operation, with the second line applying just to a subset of files. Huh? The first one moves HEAD. The second one doesn't. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
