Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > I wouldn't say we can't do that. We already do log when symrefs become > dangling when updating references via HEAD by logging a zero OID as new > OID. That is, if we have "HEAD -> refs/heads/foo" and you delete the > latter, then we create a new reflog message for "HEAD" with zero OID as > new OID. > > I would claim that the current behaviour where we don't create a reflog > entry when updating a ref to become dangling is a mere bug. I think it's > fair to declare this a #leftoverbit and handle it in a follow-up patch > series. But it would be nice to say so in an in-code comment. I like that. Thanks.
