Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > ... By > having zero-oid for the new and old value in the reflog. But seems like > we can't do that either. Even if you could, the transition from refs/heads/main to refs/heads/next would not be captured. In any case, that is not something this step changes. My assumption is that for most of developers it would be unexpected for the theme to "allow symbolic updates to be transactional" to change it, hence "we do not explain what we did not change". Thanks.
