Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Ah, OK. Even though I was the one who stole this feature from >> elsewhere, I forgot that we had that many commands, and it makes the >> decision a lot simpler ;-) > > Yes, it always surprises me how many there are when the help is printed. > >> So the log message may want a bit of rewrite in the title and the >> introductory part, with a clarification that '?' is what we already >> had and not what this adds (from Patrick's comment), and there may >> be other small improvements we want to see that I may have missed, >> but other than these small-ish points, the basic direction of this >> patch is good? > > I think so. OK, let me mark the topic as expecting hopefully a final reroll in the draft "What's cooking" report. Thanks.
