On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Phillip Wood wrote: > > However, it is possible that the editor exits with an error status, in > > which case we show an error message and then return to our caller. In > > such a case, the error message is given where the terminal cursor > > happens to be, which is most likely after the "we are waiting for your > > editor" message on the same line. > > As I've said before I'm not sure how likely that is as I think the editor > will probably have printed a message if there was an error. For instance, Vim with ":cq" does not emit any error message. > Assuming the > message from the editor ends with a newline the proposed change wont do any > harm so I don't object to it. Thanks.
