Re: [PATCH 3/3] t3428: restore coverage for "apply" backend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx writes:

>> Hmph, doesn't this lose coverage for the merge backend, though?
>
> I don't think so, we had coverage for the merge backend from the other
> tests before 2ac0d6273f as all of the other tests in this file use the
> merge backend. We're no longer testing "--signoff" without specifying
> some other option that selects a backend but it seems unlikely that we
> could break that without breaking one of the other tests.

OK, so we have "rebase --merge --signoff" tested elsewhere and we
are replacing "rebase --signoff" with "rebase --apply --signoff"?

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux