Re: [PATCH 3/3] t3428: restore coverage for "apply" backend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This test file assumes the "apply" backend is the default which is not
> the case since 2ac0d6273f (rebase: change the default backend from "am"
> to "merge", 2020-02-15). Make sure the "apply" backend is tested by
> specifying it explicitly.

Hmph, doesn't this lose coverage for the merge backend, though?

> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  t/t3428-rebase-signoff.sh | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t3428-rebase-signoff.sh b/t/t3428-rebase-signoff.sh
> index 133e54114f6..1bebd1ce74a 100755
> --- a/t/t3428-rebase-signoff.sh
> +++ b/t/t3428-rebase-signoff.sh
> @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' '
>  
>  # We configure an alias to do the rebase --signoff so that
>  # on the next subtest we can show that --no-signoff overrides the alias
> -test_expect_success 'rebase --signoff adds a sign-off line' '
> -	git rbs HEAD^ &&
> +test_expect_success 'rebase --apply --signoff adds a sign-off line' '
> +	git rbs --apply HEAD^ &&
>  	test_commit_message HEAD expected-signed
>  '




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux