On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 8:52 PM Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2024-03-25 21:54, Dragan Simic wrote: > > On 2024-03-25 21:49, Eric Sunshine wrote: > >> The range-diff is particularly valuable exactly for this case (new > >> versions of old patches) since it is a "diff" between the old patches > >> and the new patches. Thus, it provides reviewers with a precise > >> summary of what changed between, say, v2 and v3 of a series, and > >> manifests as a concrete representation of what your prose explanation > >> describes. > > > > I see, and I do understand the purpose of range-diffs: they make > > reviewing new patch versions significantly easier, by relieving the > > reviewers from the need to track down what has been changed in the > > current patch version. > > As a note, I kept my promise :) and have started providing range-diffs > in patch submissions. [1] Glad to hear. Thanks.
