Hi Brian On 25/03/2024 23:16, Brian Lyles wrote:
This is the final planned re-roll of this series, addressing two minor style concerns with commit 4/7 as noted in this [2] thread. All other commits are left unchanged. [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqa5mmhvx5.fsf@gitster.g Range-diff from v4: 1: f6b8a655cd = 1: f6b8a655cd docs: address inaccurate `--empty` default with `--exec` 2: 401de76c0b = 2: 401de76c0b docs: clean up `--empty` formatting in git-rebase(1) and git-am(1) 3: 031b3bb7bb = 3: 031b3bb7bb rebase: update `--empty=ask` to `--empty=stop` 4: fd53c39482 ! 4: d3bfe41819 sequencer: handle unborn branch with `--allow-empty` @@ sequencer.c: static struct object_id *get_cache_tree_oid(struct index_state *ist struct commit *head_commit; struct index_state *istate = r->index; + const char *head_name; - -- if (!resolve_ref_unsafe("HEAD", RESOLVE_REF_READING, &head_oid, NULL)) -- return error(_("could not resolve HEAD commit")); ++ + if (!resolve_ref_unsafe("HEAD", RESOLVE_REF_READING, &head_oid, NULL)) { -+ /* -+ * Check to see if this is an unborn branch -+ */ -+ head_name = resolve_ref_unsafe("HEAD", RESOLVE_REF_READING | RESOLVE_REF_NO_RECURSE, &head_oid, NULL); -+ if (!head_name || !starts_with(head_name, "refs/heads/") || !is_null_oid(&head_oid)) ++ /* Check to see if this is an unborn branch */ ++ head_name = resolve_ref_unsafe("HEAD", ++ RESOLVE_REF_READING | RESOLVE_REF_NO_RECURSE, ++ &head_oid, NULL); ++ if (!head_name || ++ !starts_with(head_name, "refs/heads/") || ++ !is_null_oid(&head_oid)) + return error(_("could not resolve HEAD commit")); + head_tree_oid = the_hash_algo->empty_tree; + } else { + head_commit = lookup_commit(r, &head_oid);
This version is definitely more readable, thanks
+- if (!resolve_ref_unsafe("HEAD", RESOLVE_REF_READING, &head_oid, NULL)) +- return error(_("could not resolve HEAD commit")); +- - head_commit = lookup_commit(r, &head_oid); + /* + * If head_commit is NULL, check_commit, called from
This looks strange, but if I do a range-diff locally from v4 to v5 I only see the line wrapping changes above so I don't think it is anything to worry about.
Thanks for working on this Phillip
5: 90dca45c12 = 5: 5e690bca6e sequencer: do not require `allow_empty` for redundant commit options 6: ab3b6afc97 = 6: ed03908e9e cherry-pick: enforce `--keep-redundant-commits` incompatibility 7: 0e2577ea56 = 7: d3cf068c45 cherry-pick: add `--empty` for more robust redundant commit handling Brian Lyles (7): docs: address inaccurate `--empty` default with `--exec` docs: clean up `--empty` formatting in git-rebase(1) and git-am(1) rebase: update `--empty=ask` to `--empty=stop` sequencer: handle unborn branch with `--allow-empty` sequencer: do not require `allow_empty` for redundant commit options cherry-pick: enforce `--keep-redundant-commits` incompatibility cherry-pick: add `--empty` for more robust redundant commit handling Documentation/git-am.txt | 20 ++++++--- Documentation/git-cherry-pick.txt | 30 ++++++++++--- Documentation/git-rebase.txt | 26 +++++++---- builtin/rebase.c | 16 ++++--- builtin/revert.c | 38 +++++++++++++++- sequencer.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++------------- t/t3424-rebase-empty.sh | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++-- t/t3501-revert-cherry-pick.sh | 14 ++++-- t/t3505-cherry-pick-empty.sh | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++- t/t3510-cherry-pick-sequence.sh | 32 ++++++++++++++ 10 files changed, 286 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)